Rukshad Davar’s update on protectionism published by Financial Express

by | Dec 14, 2020

Rukshad Davar, Partner & Head – M&A Practice Group, and Kritika Agarwal, Principal at Majmudar & Partners have compiled an update on the increasingly protectionist measures being taken by countries around the world and their impact on the global economy. The full update, which has been published by the Financial Express can be read here.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused widespread economic uncertainty globally, and coupled with the US-China trade war, has caused countries to adopt protectionist measures. While the regulations introduced by India, the US, the UK, and the European Union have taken different forms, the underlying concern is uniform – save homegrown companies, especially in strategic sectors, from being acquired by state-backed investors from other countries.

India has introduced protectionist measures in two ways. One, the Indian government has launched the “Atmanirbhar Bharat” policy, which translates to “self-reliant India,” to promote local industry and reach self-sufficiency in the near future.

Second, foreign direct investments in Indian companies from border sharing countries now require prior approval of the Indian government. This requirement is applicable for direct investments, as well as investments that are beneficially held by entities or citizens of neighboring countries. This rule is primarily aimed at regulating investments from China and may also cover investments from entities based in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Further, the Indian government has not provided a de minimis threshold for beneficial ownership of, or indirect investment by, an entity or a citizen of a border sharing country. This ambiguity has led to significant uncertainty specifically in the case of acquisitions and greenfield ventures by foreign listed corporations and investment funds, whose beneficial ownership may at times not be traceable easily.

Reports also suggest that applications made to the Indian government under this new rule have not been cleared as yet, more so in light of the border tussle between India and China.

That said, the US, the European Union, and the UK already have or are looking to introduce similar protectionist measures.

More News

Akil Hirani interviewed by The Legal 500

Original source: Legal500.com Akil Hirani, Managing Partner and Head of Transactions, outlines the philosophy of the firm and explains how the firm is adapting to client needs. What do you see as the main points that differentiate Majmudar & Partners from your...

read more

Karnataka Gig Worker Law

The Karnataka government has recently issued the Karnataka Platform-Based Gig Workers (Social Security and Welfare) Bill, 2024 (Bill) and has invited objections/ suggestions from stakeholders.  The provisions of the Bill will apply to all platform aggregators in...

read more

India – Press Note 3 Update

A recent press report suggests that the Indian government is likely to clear joint venture proposals involving Chinese companies like Haier, Suzhou Innovance, China Highly Group and others where the Indian partner has a majority shareholding in the joint venture. In...

read more

No GST on slump sale transactions in India

In an important ruling in the Piramal Enterprises Limited’s case under the erstwhile VAT statute, the Bombay High Court (BHC) has reiterated that a business transfer as a going concern is to be treated as a slump sale, and the assets of the business cannot be...

read more

Benchmark Litigation Rankings 2024

We are pleased to share that we have been ranked for multiple practice areas in the Benchmark Litigation 2024 rankings. Firm Rankings Labour and Employment White-collar Crime Commercial and Transactions Insolvency International Arbitration Government and Regulatory...

read more